In four decades of building companies and sitting with founders, I have almost never met one who failed for lack of effort. I have rarely met one who failed for lack of ambition, or drive, or ideas. What I have seen, again and again, is founders losing their way for one reason: they cannot see the whole terrain at once.

They are working harder than anyone around them, and still the business is not moving the way it should — and they cannot tell you why. That gap, between how hard you are pulling and how little seems to move, is one of the loneliest places in business. I know it from the inside.

The instinct, when a venture stalls, is to reach for a tactic. Fix the funnel. Hire the head of sales.

Redo the pricing. Run the offsite. Sometimes one of those is the answer.

More often it is like adjusting the sails when the real problem is that you have lost your sense of where you are on the map. Strategy without clarity is just expensive motion. You can execute brilliantly in the wrong direction, and most of the time you will not find out until it has cost you a year.

The Venture Compass, which I wrote with my MAD co-lead Mac Christopherson, came out of trying to give founders the thing I kept reaching for and could never find: a single, honest picture of where a venture actually is. Not a forecast. Not a vanity dashboard.

A diagnostic — a way to read the interconnected forces that shape every venture's trajectory, and, crucially, to read them together rather than one at a time. Any one of those forces, looked at in isolation, will mislead you. Revenue can look healthy while the foundation underneath it is cracking.

Culture can feel strong while the model quietly stops working. It is only when you hold them in the same frame that the real story appears. At the centre of the Compass is one simple, uncomfortable idea: the gap.

There is where you are — your current reality. There is where you could be — your potential reality. And then there are the specific forces holding the two apart.

Most founders can feel that gap. Very few can name it precisely, and you cannot close a gap you cannot name. So the first move is always the same.

Stop optimising. Locate yourself. What I have learned is that clarity is not a soft virtue you get to once the urgent work is done.

It is the work. A founder who can see the whole terrain makes faster decisions, wastes less money, and — this matters more than people admit — sleeps better, because the anxiety of the stalled venture is very often the anxiety of not knowing which thing is actually wrong. The fog is worse than the problem.

Once the problem has a name and a place on the map, it becomes something you can act on instead of something that acts on you. The Compass also does something I did not fully anticipate when we started writing. It gives founders, teams and investors a shared language.

So much of what looks like conflict inside a company is really two people describing the same terrain with different words, each convinced the other is wrong. Hand them a common map and the argument changes shape. It stops being personal and becomes structural — and structural problems can be solved.

That alone has rescued partnerships I thought were past saving. I wrote this book for founders at every point on the road: the ones just setting out, the ones in the violence of scaling, and the ones navigating a hard season of change and wondering if they have lost the plot. You have not lost the plot.

You have lost the map. Ambition was never your problem. The clarity to aim it — that is the thing worth building.

The Venture Compass is my attempt to put that clarity back in your hands.

End

Continue

More from the archive.

Back to the journal